In the US OTT video market, a single service of 20 channels is costing $20, so why should AT&Ts service of 100 channels not costs $50? Surely that’s half a dollar each, better value than the $20 services or the sub $10 SVoD market? Well it is and it isn’t and there are two major points that have to be made here. OTT Video is an experimental market and at present only a handful of people out of each 100 who try it, go on to cut the cord. So it is about additions to the video pie right now, not replacements. Sure, it will come to be about replacements, but not immediately. If you have a $150 ARPU pay…